Example Game
A full walkthrough for 13 players showing the main mechanics.
It follows the turn structure from Moderator Reference.
Setup
| Player | Role |
|---|---|
| A | Good Politician |
| B | Good Politician |
| C | Corrupt Politician |
| D | Corrupt Politician |
| E | Corrupt Politician |
| F | Lawyer |
| G | Ombudsperson |
| H | COA |
| I to M | Citizens |
Trackers: Public Spending = 0, Corruption Fund = 0. Targets: Good = 24, Bad = 20. The Kaban ng Bayan starts at 13 and is visible to everyone.
Corrupt Recognition: C, D, and E open eyes, identify each other, then close eyes. No steal happens here. Stealing begins in the Year 1 Hidden Phase.
Year 1
Hidden Phase
- Lawyer (F): Protects A.
- Ombudsperson (G): Investigates C, gets Bad aligned.
- Corrupt (C, D, E): All agree to steal. Corruption Fund += 3 = 3. Kaban ng Bayan drops by 3 (private).
- COA (H): No prior audit available.
Public Phase
Treasury announcement: "No previous treasury report is available."
Revenue: 13 players × 1 = +13.
Election: B elected President (serves Years 1 and 2).
Governance: B picks the Large Project (cost 5, kickback 4, committee 5). Selects: A, C, G, I, J.
Votes: A Support, C Support, G Support, I Support, J Oppose. 4 of 5, so it succeeds.
- A is a Good Politician on the committee, so Public Spending = 5.
- C is a Corrupt Politician on the committee, so Corruption Fund += 4 = 7.
- COA report saved:
Project: [Year 1 large] · Kickback: Yes.
Discussion: G drops a vague hint that someone on the committee is Bad aligned but does not name a player yet.
Jail vote: Majority votes I. Not protected. I jailed, first strike. (Returns Year 4.)
Win check: Spending 5 of 24. Corruption Fund 7 of 20. No win.
End of year: Treasury drop = 3 (Hidden Phase theft) + 5 (project) = 8. Saved for the Year 2 announcement.
Year 2
Hidden Phase
- Lawyer (F): Protects D.
- Ombudsperson (G): Investigates D, gets Bad aligned.
- Corrupt (C, D, E): All agree to steal. Corruption Fund += 3 = 10.
- COA (H): Receives the Year 1 audit.
Project: [Year 1 large] · Kickback: Yes.
Public Phase
Treasury announcement: "The Kaban ng Bayan decreased by 8 last Year." (3 theft + 5 project.)
Revenue: 12 active players × 1 = +12.
B is still President (Year 2 of the term).
Governance: B picks the Small Project (cost 2, kickback 1, committee 3). Selects: A, D, K.
Votes: A Support, D Support, K Support. 3 of 3, so it succeeds.
- A is a Good Politician on the committee, so Public Spending += 2 = 7.
- D is a Corrupt Politician on the committee, so Corruption Fund += 1 = 11.
- COA report saved:
Project: [Year 2 small] · Kickback: Yes.
The COA shares the Year 1 audit: "A kickback was paid on last Year's project." The committee composition is public, so the table revisits who sat on it (A, C, G, I, J) — at least one of them is Corrupt.
Discussion: G now has two Bad aligned reads (C from Year 1, D from Year 2). G speaks up:
"I am the Ombudsperson. My investigation this Year says D is Bad aligned. Last Year I read C as Bad aligned too."
The table now has two named suspects. There is no special vote here. G's claim just feeds the regular jail vote.
Jail vote: D is protected by Lawyer (F). The table reads the room and votes on C instead. C is not protected. C jailed, first strike. (Returns Year 5.)
Win check: Spending 7 of 24. Corruption Fund 11 of 20. No win. G's identity is now public.
End of year: Treasury drop = 3 (theft) + 2 (project) = 5. Saved for Year 3.
Year 3
Hidden Phase
- Lawyer (F): Protects A.
- Ombudsperson (G): Investigates B, gets Good aligned.
- Corrupt (D and E free, C suspended): Both agree to steal. Corruption Fund += 2 = 13.
- COA (H): Receives the Year 2 audit.
Project: [Year 2 small] · Kickback: Yes. The Year 2 committee was small (A, D, K) and produced a kickback — strong signal that one of D or K is Corrupt (A is Good).
Public Phase
Treasury announcement: "The Kaban ng Bayan decreased by 5 last Year." (3 steal + 2 project.)
Revenue: 11 active players × 1 = +11. (C and I are suspended. Neither pays.)
B's term ends. A is elected President (serves Years 3 and 4).
Governance: A picks the Large Project (cost 6, kickback 5, committee 7). A leaves D and E off the committee. Committee: A, B, F, G, H, K, L. All Good or neutral. Project succeeds. No Corrupt on the committee, so no kickback. A (Good Politician) is on the committee, so Public Spending += 6 = 13.
- COA report saved:
Project: [Year 3 large] · Kickback: No.
The COA shares the Year 2 audit: "A kickback was paid on last Year's project." The Year 2 committee was small (A, D, K); combined with G's earlier Bad-aligned read on D, the table strongly suspects D.
Jail vote: Majority votes D. Not protected. D jailed, first strike. (Returns Year 6.)
Win check: Spending 13 of 24. Corruption Fund 13 of 20. C and D both on a first strike, both suspended. No win.
End of year: Treasury drop = 2 (theft) + 6 (project) = 8. Saved for Year 4.
Year 4
Hidden Phase
- Lawyer (F): Protects B.
- Ombudsperson (G): Investigates K, gets Good aligned.
- Corrupt (E only free; C and D suspended): E alone votes to steal. Corruption Fund += 1 = 14.
- COA (H): Receives the Year 3 audit.
Project: [Year 3 large] · Kickback: No. Clean. Confirms A's committee held no Corrupt.
Public Phase
I returns from suspension at start of Year 4. First strike announced.
Treasury announcement: "The Kaban ng Bayan decreased by 8 last Year." (2 theft + 6 project.)
Revenue: 11 active players × 1 = +11. (C and D suspended. I is back.)
A is still President (Year 2 of the term).
Governance: A picks the Large Project (cost 5, kickback 3, committee 5). Clean committee. Project succeeds. Public Spending += 5 = 18.
The COA shares the Year 3 audit: "No kickback on last Year's project." The table is satisfied. A clean Year.
Jail vote: The table jails E (correct guess this time). Not protected. E jailed, first strike.
Win check: Spending 18 of 24. Corruption Fund 14 of 20. No win.
End of year: Treasury drop = 1 (theft) + 5 (project) = 6. Saved for Year 5.
Year 5: The Decisive Year
C returns from suspension at start of Year 5. First strike announced.
"C has served their suspension and is now back. This is their first strike."
D and E still suspended.
Hidden Phase
- Lawyer (F): Protects C. (A bad call, but the table does not yet know C's role for sure.)
- Ombudsperson (G): Investigates C, gets Bad aligned (confirmed again, but G is already exposed from Year 2).
- Corrupt (C only free): C alone votes to steal. Corruption Fund += 1 = 15.
- COA (H): Receives the Year 4 audit.
Project: [Year 4 large] · Kickback: No.
Public Phase
Treasury announcement: "The Kaban ng Bayan decreased by 6 last Year." (1 theft + 5 project.)
Revenue: 11 active players × 1 = +11.
A's term ends. B elected President (serves Years 5 and 6).
Governance: B picks the Large Project (cost 6, kickback 5, committee 7). B leaves C off the committee. Project succeeds. No kickback. Public Spending += 6 = 24.
Good wins
Good wins by the Public Spending Threshold. Public Spending reaches 24.
Key Moments Illustrated
| Year | Mechanic shown |
|---|---|
| Setup | Corrupt recognition only. No steal at setup. |
| 1 | Corrupt steal in the Hidden Phase, kickback added when a Corrupt sits on the committee, COA last in order |
| 2 | Ombudsperson openly names suspects in Discussion, Lawyer Protect saves D, C gets a first strike |
| 3 | COA shares the Year 2 audit (one Year delay), clean committee strategy, D first strike |
| 4 | Two Corrupt suspended, one Corrupt still free to steal, table size shrinks, E first strike |
| 5 | C back on a first strike, Good wins through the spending race before D and E return |